<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metacritic album reviews make it to Spotiseek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spotiseek.com/2010/01/metacritic-album-reviews-make-it-to-spotiseek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spotiseek.com/2010/01/metacritic-album-reviews-make-it-to-spotiseek/</link>
	<description>The Spotiseek development blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olle</title>
		<link>http://blog.spotiseek.com/2010/01/metacritic-album-reviews-make-it-to-spotiseek/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Olle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spotiseek.com/?p=67#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Great, like it. As you say, metacritic.com is a great site to find reviews and get an general idea off the an album.

Your colourtagging off the scores doesn&#039;t match those off metacritic.com, this intetional or just a misstake?
metacritics.com tagging (from http://www.metacritic.com/about/scoring.shtml )
Universal Acclaim (Green)	81-100
Generally Favorable Reviews (Green)	61-80
Mixed or Average Reviews (Yellow)	40-60
Generally Unfavorable Reviews (Red)	20-39
Overwhelming Dislike (Red)	0-19

Another great site with the genarally same idea is http://www.kritiker.se/ It collects reviews from swedish media, so understanding Swedish does help, but I guess you can get the grasp off an album even if you can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, like it. As you say, metacritic.com is a great site to find reviews and get an general idea off the an album.</p>
<p>Your colourtagging off the scores doesn&#8217;t match those off metacritic.com, this intetional or just a misstake?<br />
metacritics.com tagging (from <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/about/scoring.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.metacritic.com/about/scoring.shtml</a> )<br />
Universal Acclaim (Green)	81-100<br />
Generally Favorable Reviews (Green)	61-80<br />
Mixed or Average Reviews (Yellow)	40-60<br />
Generally Unfavorable Reviews (Red)	20-39<br />
Overwhelming Dislike (Red)	0-19</p>
<p>Another great site with the genarally same idea is <a href="http://www.kritiker.se/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kritiker.se/</a> It collects reviews from swedish media, so understanding Swedish does help, but I guess you can get the grasp off an album even if you can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afront</title>
		<link>http://blog.spotiseek.com/2010/01/metacritic-album-reviews-make-it-to-spotiseek/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Afront</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spotiseek.com/?p=67#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Great idea Kristofer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea Kristofer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

